BadgeHelp.com
Home Help News Registration Privacy Policy
  Pogo cheat badge help blog    

 « Scrabtacular 1.2 has b... JigsawGPS is the new J... » 

I need DinnerSpinner TSR's

Any one who is getting the "can't find pixie" errors, I need TSR's. We are focusing on getting this problem solved.

Any other problems with DinnerSpinner also please forward the TSR






Comments to this post  (13 in total)

Name: Joe C   
@July 7, 2008 00:53:02
Oscar

Please confirm that you have my WINDOWS 2000 TSR for DINNER SPINNER. Also, DINNER SPINNER is working only marginally well in VISTA, but not to the level of needing a TSR. It plays on Medium but does not play on higher levels. Also, it does not like to be interfered with during game play. It performs poorly if it is paused and then reset.


Name: Oscar   
@July 7, 2008 02:49:54
yeah, we got it


Name: JJ   
@July 7, 2008 03:35:05
Oscar,
I have sent TSRs for DinnerSpinner about the agent not finding the pixie, only using one oven on Master Chef until you play through to a spin one level lower, the pixie not using power ups well, not serving customers in order to get power ups, and randomly dumping things in the trash. I hope you have gotten the TSRs.


Name: Dee   
@July 7, 2008 12:00:33
I did send a TSR on this problem, and agree on what was said about it not working if paused or reset. I managed to get my badge on beginner, but even on beginner I was getting the pixie can't be found it would not work beyond easy for me using XP.


Name: David   
@July 9, 2008 09:16:34
I sent in my TSR as requested showing can't find pixie message.


Name: David   
@July 11, 2008 21:13:23
When are the issues ever going to get fixed with this game? It has been over 5 days.


Name: Dale S.   
@July 12, 2008 03:02:55
A little patience will go a long way... Keep up the awesome work going on over there.


Name: George   
@July 14, 2008 02:48:18
Oscar

can you check greenback bayou helper I tried to install it and it gives me a error and a box pops up wanting to debug it........Thanks


Name: Bill   
@July 21, 2008 06:31:40
Oscar,

First let me start out by saying that you guys do an awesome job with all of these games and I have purchased many of your cheats. I have sent in a TSR as your requested. I am just curious as to why there have been 5 updates to the Jigsaw GPs cheat and nothing done for this game. Is Crazy Cakes going to ever get any attention and eventually fixed?


Name: vicki   
@July 25, 2008 01:02:33
has anyone had issues with the pinocle card counter

since the ex 7 it cannot find target a good percentage of the time


Name: Joe C   
@July 25, 2008 14:24:07
Oscar

I put some analysis for ZIPEAKS ZOLITAIRE 1.6 for TRIPEAKS SOLITAIRE. Pogo is planning on extending this game. Please create a new thread where we can talk about the requirements and why we will need ZIPEAKS to go back to its old-school Pogo Butt-Kicking self. Please, I need a version that does not fly under the radar, hiding from the high score board. I would like it BEFORE Pogo extends the game so I do not have to play in a room with a bunch of grumpy regular Pogo players complaining about scores.


Name: jj   
@July 27, 2008 17:06:04
Oscar,
Those are interesting stats that Joe C put up on Tri Peaks Solitaire. I would have to agree with him since ranking up in that game is so slow. Is there some way to tweak it so that it wins more and gets those artifacts?
As always, your efforts are appreciated.


Name: Joe C   
@July 28, 2008 14:30:52
JJ

The fixes have been forwarded in the past. If there is a new TRI-PEAKS thread, I can go into it more. However, if you watch the client play, watch how often it makes a "bad" choice when it has two options. For example, card is a seven (7) and there are two eights (8) on the board. One of the eights would free up two cards. The other eight would stop the streak. Can you guess which eight ZIPEAKS will play?
Then run the same experiment with RUBYQUEST. That client is much "smarter".

Please note that I am not talking about being lucky or guessing what is below the cards. In the past, ZIPEAKS used to be just like RUBYQUEST. The 62% winning percentage when I finished the game using the "smart" version is now down to 50% and still declining.


Add new comment

Name:
Email:
Website:
Comment:


Login


     English     Deutsch     Française     Español     Italiana     Portuguesa